Or OP just likes the independent outlet 404 Media, as I also do. Gizmodo features AI-generated articles (ones with the byline “Gizmodo bot”). It takes a simple adblocker or the bypass paywalls clean extension to bypass the authwall.

Even including that the speed limit saves lives. It’s not like they controlled for distractions; if they do indeed get distracted note that did not lead to more accidents.

No paywall for this article yet: “Sign up for free access to this post”, it’s not a free trial.

What are the further steps needed to comply specified by Patreon or by you? (And your Ad Hominem is completely baseless. Check my post history if you will)

If there were a real issue, Patreon would send a real reply explaining what is needed to Catbox’s screenshotted inquiry instead of boilerplating “you can make a new Patreon in two months if you don’t violate the guidelines”.

Compliance with the law after you’re caught with this type of content isn’t enough

Tell that to Imgur. You’re asking Catbox to have a 100% detection rate which is impossible. How would you make these changes?

they refused

heh‽ where are you getting this from? can i have some? There isn’t even any indication the Patreon has ever been shut down before.

What do you mean by “continually” having this issue if Catbox already removes offenses much faster than most major content providers? And my impression is Patreon said such handling was sufficient in 2021.

Weird, I don’t get anything like that on the blog post. Here’s the link to donate:

https://store.catbox.moe/

Edit: Okay I managed to get it on Microsoft Edge. The no thanks button works for me, though, and you can still scroll the parts outside the popup box.

You still have to sign up (be a customer) for any plan to even use Cloudflare in the first place, and the free plan quota is 1GB per month.

Okay, I got the link: https://www.missingkids.org/content/dam/missingkids/pdfs/cybertiplinedata2024/2024-notifications-by-ncmec-resulting-content-removal.pdf

Whereas Catbox’s average removal time is 1.93 days, CloudFlare’s is 1.92. Alibaba’s is 4.39. Imgur’s is 4.6. Amazon’s is 5.23. Google’s is 5.52. Fastly’s is 5.63. GoDaddy’s is 8.77.

Have you evaluated the costs? I would think that one-time purchases + electricity bill are much cheaper than a subscription.

We also work closely with NCMEC to review and remove CSAM content within 48 hours of receiving the report. You can review our statistics with the NCMEC content removal report here: <link my tesseract OCR did not pick up> We have previously interacted with Patreon with regards to this content in March 2021, and brought ourselves in compliance with Patreon’s request.

—Catbox’s screenshotted reply, met with a boilerplate “you may create a new patreon compliant with our guidelines in 2 months” response

There’s only one person whose taunting tone forces the other on the defensive here.

No? It’s a gift article.

Indeed all lives matter, but the All Lives Matter is a strawman movement that misses the point

This is such a ridiculous claim that it’s not even worth responding to.

So is 29 cyclists all getting run over.

https://www.google.com/search?q=innocent+drivers+accused+of+vehicular+homicide https://www.google.com/search?q=innocent+drivers+accused+of+vehicular+manslaughter+of+cyclists

I’ve tried. I don’t see anything to objectively evince your claims in reality. In fact according to the AAA, “Nearly half of those killed in red light running crashes were passengers or people in other vehicles and more than 5% were pedestrians or cyclists.” If you want to prove the opposite, start your own study.

You think the damage of 29 cyclist collisions is insane, and I think it’s not. You have biases that lie something else, that’s fine. But accusing me of ignoring what you’ve said when I’ve directly addressed them multiple times? In case it wasn’t clear enough, here’s what I meant.

100 people getting broken bones is better than one person dying. Not to mention how probably motor vehicle accidents are to cause a chain reaction, that cyclists’ much lower inertia means they slow down much faster, and that motorists are more likely to be distracted—by bells and whistles and passengers and whatnot. Plus the ratio was ~36:1 (~29:1 excluding non-motorcycle bicycles, i.e. bikes that aren’t e-bikes or mopeds and can’t go above 15mph), not 100:1, as of 2016. Assuming constant speed and ignoring all the not-to-mentions, the median American vehicle delivers the kinetic energy of about 13 e-bikes. That’s very little less-than-half of the 29 of the ratio.

That’s a direct analysis of the damage of a car. Cars have the same damage if they just cause accidents merely two times more than e-bikes, which they do at far more than two times; I did this math for someone else before and I think NY had data at the Statistics Repository for Traffic Safety or something like that (though the data did not factor in runs that treated the light as a stop sign). And not to mention that’s e-bikes. Bicycles only have a 6:1 frequency ratio and one car running a red light far eclipses the potential damage of 6 normal bicycles. The article doesn’t apply to just e-bikes; it applies to normal bicycles too.

As for the cyclist getting impacted, there’s no mechanism that would automatically blame the driver or is more likely to falsely implicate the driver. Unless I’m not aware of articles that prove the contrary?

I agree, but wouldn’t you say it’s a mistake to use asshole cyclists to represent cyclists at large?

Yeah, just clarifying.

Edit: I’m not trying to be hostile; I’m just trying my best to be helpful… Please tell me if there’s something I could improve on.

those 100 squishy cyclists running red lights can all get hit by cars

Even just 29 all getting run over is a ways less likely than a single car causing a chain reaction and causing the same amount of damage.

possibly sending the innocent drivers to jail for vehicular homicide.

Show me. I doubt that’s more likely than sending an innocent rider to jail.

a large number of cyclists running red lights is demonstrably more dangerous than a small number of motorists running red lights

You completely ignore my 108-word argument to the contrary.

Kids don’t ride e-bikes that are basically mopeds or seriously injure others.

deleted by creator