If those "s were already in your comment, you shouldn’t have needed it :/ satire on the internet is getting harder to make I guess
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
Manticore@lemmy.nzto Technology@lemmy.world•Samsung teams up with Glance to use your face in AI-generated lock screen adsEnglish3·1 day agoThat’s just the money their making itself. When it comes down to what are we subscribing for, it keeps being ads again. They keep deciding that subscriptions make money by removing ads.
Like, why not subscriptions that actually add something gainful? Subscribe to stream your games to any TV, subscribe to get dog food delivered to your house monthly, subscribe to Socks of the Month Club. Those things exist in other industries, but tech?? Nope, it’s just ads, or subscribe to less ads.
Manticore@lemmy.nzto Technology@lemmy.world•Samsung teams up with Glance to use your face in AI-generated lock screen adsEnglish501·2 days agoAre techbros so bland that they really can’t think of literally any fucking way to make money that isn’t just ‘ads’?
Manticore@lemmy.nzto Technology@lemmy.world•Microsoft Gives European Union Users More Control: Uninstall Edge, Store, and Say Goodbye to Bing PromptsEnglish1·4 days agoThank you, I’m not American but MS has so many ‘features’ that have been destroying my sanity, I will look into this tool when I’m back at my desktop 👍
Manticore@lemmy.nzto Technology@lemmy.world•Microsoft Gives European Union Users More Control: Uninstall Edge, Store, and Say Goodbye to Bing PromptsEnglish1·4 days agoIf you’re in the US,
Is it US specific, or do you just mean if you’re not in the EU?
Manticore@lemmy.nzto Technology@lemmy.world•VCs are starting to partner with private equity to buy up call centers, accounting firms and other "mature companies" to replace their operations with AIEnglish791·13 days agoIsn’t the MO for venture capitalists to run businesses into the ground, make them owe debt to themselves, cannibalise businesses from the inside and then run away with a profit while they bankrupt?
Not surprising to make a decision that kills a business because the entire point is to kill the golden goose
While thats also true, Im talking about reading comprehension, not Poe’s Law.
If you’re using "s, it indicates that it’s not something you’re actually saying. You’re quoting somebody else, including a hypothetical person that you’re satirising. It’s explicitly saying they’re not your real words.
That’s an issue of reading skill, and while we can certainly work to make writing more accessible for those that aren’t great at it, I don’t appreciate how people blame the writer for the treatment they receive for what is, at best, a mutual misunderstanding.
It’s gotten bad enough that I can say in the comment the person I am satirising, and again in a concluding statement. But without the ‘/s’, people still accuse me of being a monster for believing a heinous thing I deliberately used provocative language to describe.