Thank you, this is what I am thinking too. I don’t wanna create e-waste, and apart from power consumption, the nas is very handy performance wise and tackles all load.
- 1 Post
- 10 Comments
Thank you, this is what I needed to know. I thought n100 (similar to what dedicated nas has 6-10w) would bring power down considerably, and thanks to you, I now know it’s not the case.
I actually have an extension cord with IoT chip. Can measure power consumption via home assistant.
Ram is definitely abysmal on Qnap, so it’s one reason for hesitation. But I wanted to get some idea how much power saving is possible on dedicated NAS. If it’s not much, I would rather keep my PC.
It’s 6th gen i5 processor with gigabyte motherboard. And Qnap is ts-531x.
Rural usually means Hillbillies.
atk007@lemmy.worldto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•This ad that claims that windows 11 is 3 times faster than windows 10English4·20 days agowindows 11 is 3 times faster than windows 10
Yes, it’s true. It took me 3 times as fast to know that it’s shit.
atk007@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Australia could tax Google, Facebook and other tech giants with a digital services tax – but don’t hold your breathEnglish7·20 days agodon’t hold your breath
Thanks for setting expectations
atk007@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•China stages first-ever humanoid robot kickboxing match - Asia TimesEnglish10·20 days agoYeah, give terminators Neo like abilities
I am already running Snapraid and machines do spindown after sometime, but it’s still around 50w.