• 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 8th, 2025

help-circle




  • Nope. Even at 30 though, there will be a generational gap between the two of you. That’s 21 years, and a full adult lifetime of experience.

    With that said, some women are extremely mature and if your daughter thinks it’s a good idea, there’s probably no harm in trying it out. She’s probably worried about you and wants to see you happy, and this is her way of solving that problem.

    Take her up on her offer and have a good time on your date. Spend some time getting to know her like you would anyone on a date. Again, understand that even though you’re both fully grown adults, there’s going to still be a lot that you’re not going to connect with each other on.

    For example, Pokemon. You’re not going to give a shit about Pokemon, but she grew up in the hayday of it and Harry Potter and a lot of other generational things that you’re either going to need to get on board with so you can have a connection with her or it will create a rift between you eventually.


  • 100%. If it was purely a migration, it wouldn’t need to have downtime. There’s ways to replay events and eventually catch a system up (eventual consistency models).

    This feels more like they’re adding backdoor into their encryption algorithms for government agencies.

    Given who musk is, and what he’s done the last year and who he’s hanging out with in this admin, that’s a near sure thing.







  • Here’s their paper

    Here’s the relevant section from the paper:

    (It’s worth the read. Pretty much pure gold.)

    What nobody seems to explain is, why are they allowing the model to do blackmail in the first place? Even in extreme situational “danger” to its self-preservation, we should probably take blackmail off the table, ethically. Yet, they’re implying they’ve intentionally left it in as an option, if it decides.

    Morally though, we can’t trust it to do arithmetic or not talk about “white genocide in SA” thanks to muskrat. Why should we trust its moral model/choices for when to decide to employ unethical and illegal approaches to solutions?