India

they’ve had spy sats since the 1960s

its not that bad

and then people didnt vote in the 2024 election

bad things probably

we’d probably die

I dont think we know yet and that uncertainty isn’t making it any better

ik what you mean, there’s a difference between LLMs and other systems but its just generally easier to put it all under the umbrella of ‘AI’

this is because an LLM is not made for playing chess

at least it’s gunna be used for drug development now

imagine if palentir bought this stuff

ai has a place in drug development, but this is not how it should be used at all

there should always be a reliable human system to double check the results of the model

theoretically speaking, if ur a govt, and you get everyone else to stop using guns, and you don’t, then people wont get hurt from guns

pretty much everyone is a ‘baddy’ but some are vastly worse than others

musk wanted the govt to spend less, trump wanted it to spend more

I dont think it changes my pov, but it def does for other people on a large scale

you could say the same message in different parts of the same thread, and by chance one will accumulate more downvotes and one will accumulate more upvotes

for example: https://sh.itjust.works/post/39444493/18993947 and https://sh.itjust.works/post/39444493/18993522 say the same thing, but one has 42 updates and 8 downvotes and one has 120 downvotes to 23 upvotes

people need to stop looking at these numbers

probably some way to extert real power, like if it controlled a vast sum of money

and it would need to have a bunch of really complex economic models and tons of computing power

no simple answer to this, I like the question btw

All code paid for by taxpayer dollars should be open source, available for comment, for feedback, for people to build on and for people in other agencies to replicate.

as long as its not military stuff, I don’t want to be able to download a simulator for nuclear bombs or something on my PC

of course you shouldn’t why tf would you even consider this

way too risky

big brother isn’t the future

its a wonderful, wholesome, big family we can expect, everyone watching everyone else

which isn’t much better ngl

yeah people don’t understand DOGE might be the best investment known to mankind

yeah honestly though a man with 200 billion is vastly more wealthy than someone with 100 million

holding BTC long term isn’t that risky

and the ‘full faith and credit of a nation’ uhhhh the nation in question is the US. not a bad idea to consider other things to put money into