Every grass dealer claims to be that :)

First of all, what’s Chinese?

It is the mistake that the AI made that generated this manipulative troll post.

the new Global Language

This is not decided yet.

Russian is still a candidate. English still a possibility despite one large English-speaking country giving up all it’s meaning.

Seriously?

Look, the one is taking and exploiting nearly all of your data, while giving you 10.000 different well hidden opt out options, the other is taking all of your data for granted while telling you it is for your best and nobody else should have it, and promising they are never ever gonna exploit it, swear with fingers crossed… hm… OK you are right.

Each one needs a big bucket full of ice cubes on their heads.

word!

Fatasses can punish just fine.

Not when everybody can run circles around them and run away at the same time…

You can do that with this novel technology called “a second pair of glasses for reading”.

It works, I can confirm it.

Will you be running them at full load 24x7x365?

A server that isn’t running at 100% has missed the meaning of it’s life.

/s

A different world.

Have a look under these two black paperlike sheets right in the middle, where the RAM probably sits. Maybe there’s room for more.

I want glasses with the ability to clean themselves.

Other than them both being dickheads

Why do you think they need more than that?

if you match your usage to the UPS exactly, your runtime will be zero

No, it will be 1 exactly.

But what is the unit of 1? Minutes? Seconds, Hours? That’s what’s missing in the OP

I get that they’re Muslim, but come on, we live in the West and it’s a free country.

Unfortunately, that isn’t up to you to decide for them.

Be careful, try to respect a (probably) different culture. You will not be able to change them.

Try to find out what is possible to do and tell, and what is good to do and tell. It’s going to take some time (we cannot know how long).

If you behave respectful now, it will earn you their respect and this makes both of you a happier life.

No. There is nobody.
Case closed.

was shut down when the right wing came into power.

…and when M$ moved their headquarters into the city of Munich, making some nice impact on the city treasury.

The proverbial “two hearts in one chest” indicate a split mind, and create much pain.

It won’t do no good. The two would work against each other.

Not only in the holistic meaning, also from a strictly materialistical / technical point of view, there is no way to make them work synchronized. It is the very nature of the heart to determine it’s own rhythm.

the fuel is liquid sodium metal, an inexpensive and widely available commodity.

How very stupid we all have been during the last 200 years! /s

We don’t use this “inexpensive and widely available” fuel for making a campfire, or heating a house, or driving a car.

Producing enough sodium metal to enable widespread, full-scale global implementation of this technology should be practical, since the material has been produced at large scale before.

What a bullshit again.

Let us get smarter by looking at the whole cycle of energy:

Sodium metal is used as a carrier of energy in this idea. First we would need to invest energy to create the “fuel”, and later we can use the energy from it.

Now the problem gets obvious: It is not an even balance.

"There’s this natural cascade of reactions that happens when you start with sodium metal,” Chiang says. “It’s all spontaneous. We don’t have to do anything to make it happen

These reactions can only be so spontaneus because there is still a whole lot of energy stored in the sodium hydroxide after the airplane is done with it. And this energy was needed in the beginning, on the way from sodium chloride to sodium metal, but later it can not be used completely for that airplane. A good part of it is wasted afterwards.

IMHO This “gap” in the cycle makes the whole idea much less useful than this guy is telling us.

Know your enemy:

1. Dictionary attacks
2. Leaked passwords
3. Password guessing attacks

Your “system” is good against 1. but vulnerable against 2., and a bit vulnerable against 3. because of the system.