Four months ago, we asked Are LLMs making Stack Overflow irrelevant? Data at the time suggested that the answer is likely “yes:”

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Make no mistake. LLMs aren’t killing stackoverflow. LLMs just arrived to finish it off. The stuff that was killing it are the regular posters there, and their passive aggressive bullshit

  • Shirasho@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    My experience with SO is that I’ll look up a question about how to do something using X method and all the answers are like “why are you using X?” or “here’s how to do it using Y.”. You rarely find people answering the questions and instead find people trying to spread gospel about a certain tech that you aren’t using.

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      In my experience has been like “that’s a bug and was solved on version 2.1, update” and I’m having the exact problem in version 2.2 so what now?

  • TomMasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ever ask a question on SO? I tell my students to search there but never, ever ask a question. The unmitigated hostility is not what new developers need or deserve. ChatGPT won’t humiliate you for asking a question that someone else has already asked.

    • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      If LLMs just copied stack overflow they’d respond to every question with “Closed as duplicate. Question already answered.”

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        and link a slightly similar question, which’s answers can’t be used in your case, because of the small difference. also, it’s outdated since four years.

    • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      ChatGPT won’t humiliate you for asking a question that someone else has already asked.

      I don’t know, being told what a good question that was and what a good boy I am everytime I ask a stupid question feels pretty humiliating.

      (Still better than SO)

      • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s a pretty recent development, isn’t it? I remember ChatGPT being a lot more matter of factly earlier on.

        • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yep, old ChatGPT was much more blunt and factual.

          Don’t really like the recent trend of every LLM talking to me like I’m in kindergarten.

      • Sl00k@programming.dev
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Even for non newcomers, having threads marked as duplicates for problems introduced by version changes that aren’t considered in the original question/answers is a major issue.

    • piefood@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I forget where I heard the quote, but:

      Stack Overflow is a great place to find answers. Stack Overflow is a terrible place to ask questions.

      • asret@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Their moderation approach is a big part of why it’s a great place to search for answers.

  • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I had a decently awarded account on SO because I joined it in 2012. I asked and answered questions. For the first few years it was fucking awesome as a professional developer. Then it’s popularity on google search results ended up making it too well known and the comment quality dropped substantially. Then the fucking powerusers popped up and started flagging almost everye one my questions as duplicates while pointing to unrelated questions. The last I really used SO was around 2017. I got too fed up to participate in the platform because when I spent the time to make a well formed question, it would just got shut down and my time wasted.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Never again will I help provide content to a VC-backed service just so that they can rugpull us and cash-out.

    • vermaterc@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      What exactly do you accuse Stack Overflow for? As far as I know this service has always been free to use and data is easily downloadable.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        “Free to use” on a VC-backed service just means you’re the product. I am accusing them of the same thing I’m accusing each VC-backed service: That they exploit our efforts to cash out and then sell the service for someone who will enshittify it for profit.

        Also, what do you mean “easily downloadable”? Can anyone download the entire corpus of SO in a way that they could set up their own SO with the same content to bootstrap them?

        • vermaterc@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Also, what do you mean “easily downloadable”? Can anyone download the entire corpus of SO in a way that they could set up their own SO with the same content to bootstrap them?

          have you seen: https://archive.org/details/stackexchange

          That they exploit our efforts to cash out and then sell the service for someone who will enshittify it for profit.

          Can you give an example of this enshittification for profit?

            • vermaterc@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              So I agree, I thought you are talking about some profit enshittification on Stack Overflow

              • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’m not following SO practices, but I it will come for it as well. It’s inevitable. Those who paid billions for it will require a ROI

  • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not necessarily directly, many people may have abandoned learning programming because of LLMs, rather than Stack Overflow specifically.

    • INeedMana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think such trend would be so big. And anyone who has used any LLM for programming learns very quickly that those are very far from replacing anyone

      • AAA@feddit.org
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        People who know programming already, yes. People who are getting into it / want to get into it, see it as an amazing shortcut.

        I had two working students already, who thought and communicated that they don’t really need to learn programming, because they can do it with ChatGPT / Q. It was quite infuriating.

        • INeedMana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          students

          When I was a student I despised the idea of typeless var in C#. Then a few years later at my day job I fully embraced C++ auto. I understand the frustration but unfortunately being wrong is part of learning

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        For real. You can tell how good a programmer someone is, by how good they think an LLM is at programming.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    So here’s what I don’t get. LLMs were trained on data from places like SO. SO starts losing users ,and thus content. Content that LLMs ingest to stay relevant.

    So where will LLMs get their content after a certain point? Especially for new things that may come out or unique situations. It’s not like it’ll scrape the answer from a web page if people are just asking LLMs.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The need for the service that SO provided won’t go away. Eventually people will migrate to new places to discuss. LLM creators will either constantly scrape those as well, forcing them to implement more and more countermeasures and GenAI-poison, or the services themselves will enshittify and sell our content (i.e. the commons) to LLM-creators.